Aktion 23 Fnorum

Die Shoutbox hat geschrieben:16. Mai 2018, 10:44 | fehlgeleitet: gerade Mausrutscher gelesen. krass wie weit die hemmschwelle schon gefallen ist

taz hat geschrieben:Im Chat schwärmt er am 13. Oktober 2011, dass man „auf so'ner Springburg (…) schön ficken“ kann. „Hunderte Kinder und deren Familien stehen um die Hüpfburg herum und gucken“ schreibt er. Und weiter: „Dann wollen die Kinder alle mitspielen. So´n schönes zehnjähriges Poloch ist sicher schön eng…“

taz hat geschrieben:Am 16. Februar 2012 schreibt er: „Dann besaufen wir uns hemmungslos und pissen alles voll. Anschließend laden wir uns einen Stricher ein, vergewaltigen ihn und essen danach seine Leiche auf“.

The Atlantic hat geschrieben:[...]

Ultimately, the new study finds limited support for the idea that being able to delay gratification leads to better outcomes. Instead, it suggests that the capacity to hold out for a second marshmallow is shaped in large part by a child’s social and economic background—and, in turn, that that background, not the ability to delay gratification, is what’s behind kids’ long-term success.

The marshmallow test isn’t the only experimental study that has recently failed to hold up under closer scrutiny. Some scholars and journalists have gone so far to suggest that psychology is in the midst of a “replication crisis.” In the case of this new study, specifically, the failure to confirm old assumptions pointed to an important truth: that circumstances matter more in shaping children’s lives than Mischel and his colleagues seemed to appreciate.

[...]

These findings point to the idea that poorer parents try to indulge their kids when they can, while more-affluent parents tend to make their kids wait for bigger rewards. Hair dye and sweet treats might seem frivolous, but purchases like these are often the only indulgences poor families can afford. And for poor children, indulging in a small bit of joy today can make life feel more bearable, especially when there’s no guarantee of more joy tomorrow.