
Ansonsten... an welche Art Ratschläge dachtest du? Wie du's technisch einrichtest? Was du damit machen kannst oder solltest? Sehenswürdigkeiten im Darknet?

Also Foren, in denen ich mit Nickname unterwegs bin, stellen kein Problem dar, aber sobald ich mich z.B. auf Amazon einlogge, bringt mir Tor in Folge auch für andere Websites gar nichts mehr?Bwana Honolulu hat geschrieben:Genereller, nicht-technischer Tip natürlich: Nutz' es nur für Dinge, die losgelöst sind von deiner "üblichen Identität" (oder Identitäten) - ansonsten ist die Anonymität sofort und nachhaltig hin.
Hm, jein, schon leicht daneben, irgendwie.Tarvoc hat geschrieben:Also Foren, in denen ich mit Nickname unterwegs bin, stellen kein Problem dar, aber sobald ich mich z.B. auf Amazon einlogge, bringt mir Tor in Folge auch für andere Websites gar nichts mehr?
Waterfox hat geschrieben:Features
- Disabled Encrypted Media Extensions (EME)
- Disabled Web Runtime (deprecated as of 2015)
- Removed Pocket
- Removed Telemetry
- Removed data collection
- Removed startup profiling
- Allow running of all 64-Bit NPAPI plugins
- Allow running of unsigned extensions
- Removal of Sponsored Tiles on New Tab Page
- Addition of Duplicate Tab option
- Locale selector in about:preferences > General
Moonchild hat geschrieben:What is the difference between Pale Moon and Waterfox?
Since this seems to be a popular question, a highlight of the most important differences:
- Waterfox is a straight-up recompile of the Firefox source code for 64-bit systems with minimal changes. Pale Moon has individual development both under the hood and in the user interface.
- Developments in Pale Moon include added features, removed features, reinstatement of features removed from later Firefox versions, and certain code changes for optimization.
- Pale Moon is compiled with the Microsoft Visual C compiler (just like Firefox), Waterfox is compiled with the Intel C compiler.
The result is that Waterfox may run into different compiler errors not accounted for in Firefox (designed for MSVC and GCC but not ICC), as well as the more important point of having actively crippled (slower) execution on any processor that is not "GenuineIntel".- Waterfox is a 64-bit only project (32-bit would have debatable use since it is exactly the same as Firefox otherwise). Pale Moon offers both 32-bit and 64-bit versions of the browser. For plugins, Waterfox is therefore less compatible as an alternative browser, since the list of available native 64-bit plugins is (very) short. The same restriction applies to Pale Moon x64, of course, but since both platforms are available you have an option to run your preferred one (I personally run the x86 version on 64-bit windows because I need to use 32-bit authentication plugins, for example).
- Pale Moon's release schedule is independent of Mozilla's rapid release schedule of Firefox, and security/stability fixes of Firefox releases are implemented in Pale Moon for as far as they apply to both the browser code base and the operating system Pale Moon is designed for. As a result, version numbering of Pale Moon is different, and there is no "straight up comparison" of version numbers between Pale Moon and the Firefox/Waterfox pair. Major version numbers (12.*, 15.*) are kept for the major version of the gecko toolkit the browser is based on, for minimizing compatibility issues with add-ons to the browser; it's common practice to check the application version and not the toolkit version for compatibility.
In short, Firefox and Waterfox are much closer siblings, and Pale Moon is a different product that is based on the Firefox code with a high level of add-on compatibility with Firefox of the same major version.